Well base on the article Russia has one of the worst air-traffic safety records. Perhaps this crashed had many underlying causes. However, according to what I read the quality of a plane is not measured by its years, instead, for pressurization cycles. The plane has fuselage and wings and because of its short flights, those parts receive a lot of pressure damage them over time, cracks develop around the fastener holes due to metal fatigue ( http://www.airspacemag.com, 2013). There are 747 planes that are 25 or 30 years old. Here is the article where I got this information. http://www.airspacemag.com/need-to-know/NEED-lifecycles.html
The plan was 23 years old. I do not understand enough about plans to judge if it was cause or not of the accident. However, I could guess by comparing with a car. A 23 years old car is considered old, and it needs a very constant maintenance. So, a 23 years old plan probably could be the problem, or at least a beneficial fact for the incident.
The plane was 23 years old. I think that this gae is not too old for a plane. If the plane gets the required maintenance it needs, there should be no problem because of its age. Many underlyng circumstances caused this sore plane crush !
Well, it is quite an interesting article. The plane is definitely old, and as I know for a fact based on the experience I had in aviation, planes in Russia don't have enough maintenance. There is always a good possibility that the crash might happen, On the other hand, I would never believe that the son of the president of Tatarstan and the head of the local FBI..... there is a very small chance that something like that could happen accidentally!!! I would never believe in a co-incident especially in the situation like this!!!
The plane was 23 years old. In my opinion this didnt have to do anything with the crash. If they provides the current maintenance to the plane the age of the plane wont matter at all.
Well base on the article Russia has one of the worst air-traffic safety records. Perhaps this crashed had many underlying causes. However, according to what I read the quality of a plane is not measured by its years, instead, for pressurization cycles. The plane has fuselage and wings and because of its short flights, those parts receive a lot of pressure damage them over time, cracks develop around the fastener holes due to metal fatigue ( http://www.airspacemag.com, 2013). There are 747 planes that are 25 or 30 years old. Here is the article where I got this information. http://www.airspacemag.com/need-to-know/NEED-lifecycles.html
ReplyDeleteThe plan was 23 years old. I do not understand enough about plans to judge if it was cause or not of the accident. However, I could guess by comparing with a car. A 23 years old car is considered old, and it needs a very constant maintenance. So, a 23 years old plan probably could be the problem, or at least a beneficial fact for the incident.
ReplyDeleteThe plane was 23 years old. I think that this gae is not too old for a plane. If the plane gets the required maintenance it needs, there should be no problem because of its age. Many underlyng circumstances caused this sore plane crush !
ReplyDeleteWell, it is quite an interesting article. The plane is definitely old, and as I know for a fact based on the experience I had in aviation, planes in Russia don't have enough maintenance. There is always a good possibility that the crash might happen, On the other hand, I would never believe that the son of the president of Tatarstan and the head of the local FBI..... there is a very small chance that something like that could happen accidentally!!! I would never believe in a co-incident especially in the situation like this!!!
ReplyDeleteThe plane was 23 years old. In my opinion this didnt have to do anything with the crash. If they provides the current maintenance to the plane the age of the plane wont matter at all.
ReplyDelete