Go to the jail is a extremely consequence and it is not adequate. They change something that isn't hard to repair or may unrepair but for me they need to do something about repaid what they have done. For example, charity and pay money like a fine, or help the scout organization. There are many options but for me jail isn't one of those options because for me jail is for those that directly or indirectly affect people.
This is Kyusuk. I think they should go to jail because the article implied that they did purposely. Boy Scout discovered that they toppled over purposely and they posted on Facebook. So, sending to jail is reasonable result for all and citizens will accept the result, also the rock is 170 millions old, which means that most rocks are so valuable to toursits and U.S. citizens who want to go to Goblin State Park.
well I think going to jail would be an exaggeration from the court. However, I think that it is pertinent that these two guys accept the consequences of their acts. Of course, this is not a good behavior. They were punish by being fired of their leading positions of scouts which is very reasonable, since they do not behave as examples neither leaders.
For me, it's fair for the two boys to go to jail for their mistakes. The rock they destroyed was 170 millions old, and it can mean it is culture value of Utah. Since they destroyed it once on purpose, they should go to jail for their crime. Even though they are young and immature, it's their fault, so they should pay back their wrongness by going to jail. It may sound sorry for their parents, but they should have known the value of the rock before they did.
This is Pedro. I don;t think that sending these two men to jail would be the best action in this case. Of course that punishment is still on table, but jail cannot be one of them. These guys are not criminals so they don't deserve to go to jail. Fees and other types of punishment might be more appropriate in this case.
Of course they dont need to go to jail; however, they need to pay someway what they do. The already have been dismissed for the boy-scouts but another punishment by the government could be necessary like community work or something similar.
I don't think they should go to jail,but what they were doing was not correct. For visitors' safety, it's good to remove the hided dangerous sources; For geologists's researches, toppleing stones would be a terrible news. I think they could put a warning sign rather than topple stones directly.
It is really hard to answer. To go to jail is probably to harsh punishment on them. But on the other hand if they would not go to jail, it could show how weak and imperfect the law system is. I would say the system itself (legal system) will put them in jail so other people like them would think twice before do something like that. That is the direct duty of the system of legacy - to show people what is right , and what is not by putting people in jail even if it was not such a big of a deal!!! I feel sorry for these two guys. If they have approached it differently, they would be free now...
I think these guys are nor criminals, they just broke some rule, but it doesnt mean that they must go to jail. There are other punishments for them like fees or community service. That would be unfair if the go to jail for something like this. Of course they must learn for what they did, but jail for 1 or more years is not the answer.
Go to the jail is a extremely consequence and it is not adequate. They change something that isn't hard to repair or may unrepair but for me they need to do something about repaid what they have done. For example, charity and pay money like a fine, or help the scout organization. There are many options but for me jail isn't one of those options because for me jail is for those that directly or indirectly affect people.
ReplyDeleteThis is Kyusuk. I think they should go to jail because the article implied that they did purposely. Boy Scout discovered that they toppled over purposely and they posted on Facebook. So, sending to jail is reasonable result for all and citizens will accept the result, also the rock is 170 millions old, which means that most rocks are so valuable to toursits and U.S. citizens who want to go to Goblin State Park.
ReplyDeletewell I think going to jail would be an exaggeration from the court. However, I think that it is pertinent that these two guys accept the consequences of their acts. Of course, this is not a good behavior. They were punish by being fired of their leading positions of scouts which is very reasonable, since they do not behave as examples neither leaders.
ReplyDeleteFor me, it's fair for the two boys to go to jail for their mistakes. The rock they destroyed was 170 millions old, and it can mean it is culture value of Utah. Since they destroyed it once on purpose, they should go to jail for their crime. Even though they are young and immature, it's their fault, so they should pay back their wrongness by going to jail. It may sound sorry for their parents, but they should have known the value of the rock before they did.
ReplyDeleteThis is Pedro. I don;t think that sending these two men to jail would be the best action in this case. Of course that punishment is still on table, but jail cannot be one of them. These guys are not criminals so they don't deserve to go to jail. Fees and other types of punishment might be more appropriate in this case.
ReplyDeleteOf course they dont need to go to jail; however, they need to pay someway what they do. The already have been dismissed for the boy-scouts but another punishment by the government could be necessary like community work or something similar.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteI don't think they should go to jail,but what they were doing was not correct. For visitors' safety, it's good to remove the hided dangerous sources; For geologists's researches, toppleing stones would be a terrible news. I think they could put a warning sign rather than topple stones directly.
ReplyDeleteIt is really hard to answer. To go to jail is probably to harsh punishment on them. But on the other hand if they would not go to jail, it could show how weak and imperfect the law system is. I would say the system itself (legal system) will put them in jail so other people like them would think twice before do something like that. That is the direct duty of the system of legacy - to show people what is right , and what is not by putting people in jail even if it was not such a big of a deal!!! I feel sorry for these two guys. If they have approached it differently, they would be free now...
ReplyDeleteI think these guys are nor criminals, they just broke some rule, but it doesnt mean that they must go to jail. There are other punishments for them like fees or community service. That would be unfair if the go to jail for something like this. Of course they must learn for what they did, but jail for 1 or more years is not the answer.
ReplyDelete